RISMedia
  • News
  • Premier
  • Reports
  • Events
  • Power Broker
  • Newsmakers
  • More
    • Publications
    • Education
No Result
View All Result
  • Agents
  • Brokers
  • Teams
  • Marketing
  • Coaching
  • Technology
  • More
    • Headliners New
    • Luxury
    • Best Practices
    • Consumer
    • National
    • Our Editors
Join Premier
Sign In
RISMedia
  • News
  • Premier
  • Reports
  • Events
  • Power Broker
  • Newsmakers
  • More
    • Publications
    • Education
No Result
View All Result
RISMedia
No Result
View All Result

HUD Home Warranty RESPA Guidance Answers Questions and Raises Them

Home Best Practices
By Ken Trepeta
September 11, 2010
Reading Time: 3 mins read

RISMEDIA, September 11, 2010—On June 25, 2010, HUD issued guidance on the appropriate circumstances under which brokers and agents can be compensated on a per-transaction basis for selling home warranties under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). NAR and industry partners have been working for more than two years to get HUD to accept the legitimacy of these arrangements after an earlier interpretive letter (known commonly as the “Ceja Letter”) raised great concerns for real estate professionals and their partners in the home warranty industry and led to class action lawsuits.

While HUD has accepted that agents and brokers can be paid on a per-transaction basis and that review of transactions should be done on a case-by-case basis, serious concerns remain. One of the biggest concerns is that the marketing of these contracts to individuals by real estate agents is not enough in their view to justify compensation.

NAR and our industry partners vehemently disagree with HUD’s position. First, NAR is not entirely convinced that home warranty contracts should even be considered a settlement service. Many home warranties are sold on listing to the seller. Others are sold after closing. Even those that are sold to the buyer in conjunction with closing are not a required part of the transaction, which NAR feels is a reasonable test for whether something should be considered a settlement service under RESPA and subject to Section 8 anti-kickback provisions.

Second, even if home warranty is a settlement service, in some cases, denying compensation for marketing ignores the significant amount of effort real estate agents and brokers put in for quite modest compensation ($45 – $120 is a commonly used range). This effort cannot be fairly equated with a mere referral. Real estate brokers and agents are routinely the only people consumers interact with in a home warranty transaction. Real estate brokers and agents do not simply distribute a brochure or give someone the link to a website. They perform all the sales services, such as explaining the product, answering questions, completing necessary paperwork and, in the vast majority of cases, all initial customer service functions when a potential claim arises.

The real estate broker or agent submits a completed transaction and associated documentation to the home warranty company on behalf of the consumer. In fact, the only contact a consumer has with the home warranty company’s staff is in the event of a post-closing claim. Even then, this contact typically occurs after the real estate broker or agent has explained the appropriate claims procedures to the consumer and provided additional guidance on the home warranty’s coverage. Despite numerous meetings to explain this to HUD, the agency simply ignored these facts.

Another concern is that while HUD ratified the validity of monthly or flat-fee marketing agreements in numerous meetings, the guidance itself barely touches on these arrangements. For these reasons and others, NAR has submitted extensive comments. In those meetings, senior HUD staff made it pretty clear they had no problem with flat-fee agreements as long as they were not regularly adjusted to reflect actual sales. HUD implicitly acknowledges these rather lengthy discussions by saying, “Payments to real estate brokers or agents by the HWC (home warranty company) are based on, or adjusted in future agreements according to, the number of transactions referred” and by using the odd construction regarding marketing “to particular home buyers or sellers.” The odd construction implies that general marketing agreements not done on a per-transaction basis are, in general, acceptable. That is certainly consistent with our discussions.

NAR and the industry appreciate the efforts made by HUD staff to provide meaningful guidance, which is a significant departure from past practices. However, we feel HUD overstepped its statutory authority under RESPA with regard to the marketing and sales of home warranty contracts. NAR will continue to work with brokers, agents, industry partners, HUD and Congress to address our concerns and ensure that consumers are not denied the access to or the benefit from an affordably priced home warranty.

Ken Trepeta is director of Real Estate Services for the National Association of REALTORS®.

ShareTweetShare

Related Posts

NAR Promises Accountability and Transparency as Exec Committee Approves 2026-2028 Strategic Plan
Industry News

NAR Promises Accountability and Transparency as Exec Committee Approves 2026-2028 Strategic Plan

November 16, 2025
Global Spotlight: From Naval Base to Creative Hub—How Porto Montenegro’s New Residences Redefine Waterfront Living
Agents

Global Spotlight: From Naval Base to Creative Hub—How Porto Montenegro’s New Residences Redefine Waterfront Living

November 14, 2025
Industry Reaction to 50-Year Mortgage Proposal: Probably Not a ‘Game Changer’
Industry News

Industry Reaction to 50-Year Mortgage Proposal: Probably Not a ‘Game Changer’

November 14, 2025
MRED
Agents

MRED Doubles Down on Private Listings Despite Zillow Pressure

November 14, 2025
Century
Agents

Century 21 Expands into Orlando’s Western Suburbs With New Affiliation

November 14, 2025
AI
Industry News

Pssst…AI Is Making Us Dumber. Pass It On.

November 14, 2025
Tip of the Day

The Best Points to Advertise on for Recruiting

In order to run a successful team, you need to recruit agents who will contribute productively and positively to your sales and environment. This, sometimes, is easier said than done. Read more.

Business Tip of the Day provided by

Recent Posts

  • NAR Promises Accountability and Transparency as Exec Committee Approves 2026-2028 Strategic Plan
  • Global Spotlight: From Naval Base to Creative Hub—How Porto Montenegro’s New Residences Redefine Waterfront Living
  • Industry Reaction to 50-Year Mortgage Proposal: Probably Not a ‘Game Changer’

Categories

  • Spotlights
  • Best Practices
  • Advice
  • Marketing
  • Technology
  • Social Media

The Most Important Real Estate News & Events

Click below to receive the latest real estate news and events directly to your inbox.

Sign Up
By signing up, you agree to our TOS and Privacy Policy.

About Blog Our Products Our Team Contact Advertise/Sponsor Media Kit Email Whitelist Terms & Policies ACE Marketing Technologies LLC

© 2025 RISMedia. All Rights Reserved. Design by Real Estate Webmasters.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Premier
  • Reports
  • News
    • Agents
    • Brokers
    • Teams
    • Consumer
    • Marketing
    • Coaching
    • Technology
    • Headliners New
    • Luxury
    • Best Practices
    • National
    • Our Editors
  • Publications
    • Real Estate Magazine
    • Past Issues
    • Custom Covers
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Podcasts
    • Event Coverage
  • Education
    • Get Licensed
    • REALTOR® Courses
    • Continuing Education
    • Luxury Designation
    • Real Estate Tools
  • Newsmakers
    • 2025 Newsmakers
    • 2024 Newsmakers
    • 2023 Newsmakers
    • 2022 Newsmakers
    • 2021 Newsmakers
    • 2020 Newsmakers
    • 2019 Newsmakers
  • Power Broker
    • 2025 Power Broker
    • 2024 Power Broker
    • 2023 Power Broker
    • 2022 Power Broker
    • 2021 Power Broker
    • 2020 Power Broker
    • 2019 Power Broker
  • Join Premier
  • Sign In

© 2025 RISMedia. All Rights Reserved. Design by Real Estate Webmasters.

X